Tag Archives | Fine Gael

8% Taxi Fare Increase

There was a little controversy last week over the 8% rise in taxi fares implement over the weekend. Not that much though, and it’s pretty much died down at this stage. Sort of like how the Irish public was shafted by the benchmarking process, we consumers are expected to pay more for a service that hasn’t improved for years, and where costs are actually decreasing at the moment with the fall in petrol prices.

However, in case you didn’t see the mention of this anywhere else – are you aware that this is actually a “maximum taxi fare”?

So, you could offer a lower fare to the taxi driver, or in an effort to attract your business (in these tough times for taxi drivers) they could offer you a discount on your fare as well.

Fine Gael’s Olivia Mitchell had the following comment to make on the fare increase:

This is against both taxi driver and consumer interests and unions are misguided if they think this is going to solve the problem of a lack of business.

Yet interestingly, you should look at the type of people who are representing consumers and business interests on the taxi regulator advisory panel. You’d have to wonder what input these people had when the Regulator made her decision. If they did kick up a fuss, we definitely haven’t heard about it and obviously they were ignored.


Fine Gael’s valuable idea

The Sunday Times
Jill Kerby, January 11, 2004

Fine Gael doesn’t get much right these days but it has done the country a service with the launch of its consumer website, www.valueireland.com.

Having come to the site too late to benefit from Christmas shopping hints this year, I certainly intend to do my January sales hunting with print-outs of comments and the experiences of the hundreds of consumers who are now adding their rip-off and value stories on a daily basis.

A quick scan of the site last week showed that had I been a bit more purposeful in shopping online for the bulk of my CDs, DVDs, the DVD recorder, and Game Boy Advance purchases that were made at Christmas, I would have saved more than €110.

With a programme of home improvement projects on the cards for this year, I will be making a special trip to the DIY outlets in the north where lists of savings are posted.

It probably won’t last, but “thrift” seems to have replaced house prices as the most popular topic of the chattering classes these days. It has been a long time coming but the rot set in with the changeover to the euro and, two years into the single currency, we are all becoming a lot more aware of how expensive it is to live in this country.


Who’s really to blame for “Rip Off Ireland”

On Thursday last week, only a few days after I wrote about whether it was consumers or businesses that were at fault for the perception of “rip off Ireland”, Michael Ring, the Fine Gael TD for my home county of Mayo came up with a doozy.

According to this breaking news item on the Irish Times site, Deputy Ring had this to say:

“This issue has been discussed on TV3 and RTÉ and I want to know can we have a debate in the Dáil. It’s in relation to Tesco and Dunnes robbing the people of Ireland.” He added: “It used to be ‘rip-off Ireland’ and now it’s ‘rip off the Irish’ ”

Another classic from the Fine Gael party. I respectfully suggest that Deputy Ring contact An Garda Siochana if Irish consumers are being “robbed”.

On the other hand, if Irish consumers are willingly handing over cash to UK retailers who may be charging more in Ireland than they are in the United Kingdom, maybe Deputy Ring should use his Dail time a bit more wisely rather than jumping on the National Consumer Agency bandwagon.

Shops charge what consumers are willing to pay. If Irish consumers pay the amounts charged by UK based retailers, then they’ll continue to charge that, and possibly more. On the other hand, if Irish consumers become a little more discerning about how and where they spend their money, then such retailers will have to rethink their pricing policies.

How come we haven’t heard anyone seriously talk about a boycott if things are as bad as we’re being told?


VI Better Information 20-May-2008

  • Announced today, by Ryanair, the first price rise that makes the most sense, ever – charging for priority check-in. Coming back from Stanstead recently, there was the ridiculous situation where there was a plane full of people in the priority boarding queue, and only 1 person in the regular queue – and they still had to wait for everyone else to board. Madness!!! At least now priority boarding might actually provide some distinction.
  • Via Mr.Mulley again, further difficulties caused by Vodafone for one of their customers, BifSniff. One wonders how much you’d have to spend with them for them to actually attempt to keep one’s business.
  • I’ve been fairly critical of the National Consumer Agency on this blog – and here’s another gripe. Their Press Release and News and Research RSS feeds are driving me insane. Almost every single night, they republish hundreds of items and confuse the dates so that nothing appears in order at all – basically negating the use of the feeds at all.
  • Speaking of dodgy RSS feeds – it’s been months since I e-mailed Fine Gael about their faulty RSS feed for their news service. It’s still not working, and they don’t seem to have done anything to fix it.
  • Finally, has anyone noticed the very frustrating way in which The Sunday Tribune manage their website on a Sunday? While it’s not a great website in the first place, their way of encouraging newspaper sales rather than charging for content is to simply take down the whole website, providing a 404 message rather than doing anything more elegant.

Fine Gael – Streamlining Goverment

I’ve had a couple of e-mails from people drawing my attention to the publication of the Fine Gael policy document, Streamlining Government. All of which is extremely noble and much needed given my constant problem with the number of useless regulators we have that do absolutely nothing for Irish consumers.

It’s worth having a look at the document (available here). It’s a hardly streamlined 83 pages, but it’s very interesting reading – particularly the appendices showing the details of our nearly 1000 useless regulators.


Fine Gael Declares War on Useless Regulators

Eventually Fine Gael were going to come up with a decent idea – and yesterday it was announced that “Kenny declares €50m war against quangos“.

I’ve been pretty critical over the past couple of years about the dozens (and increasing number) of useless government created organisations which are effectively sub-contracted to do the job of the government itself.

According to this article:

OPPOSITION leader Enda Kenny has pledged to cull the huge numbers of Government-created agencies and other bodies, claiming it would save €50m a year.

The Fine Gael leader says there are now 1,000 of these bodies — known as quangos — and says he will abolish dozens of them if his party gets into power.

Our friend, Leo Varadker is apparently going to be publishing a document which will detail the plans, which will include a single Fair Trade Agency for the consumer which would take in both the National Consumer Agency and the Competition Authority. They are also proposing a consolidation of the many useless transport regulators – the agencies for taxis, aviation, Dublin and regional transport would all be amalgamated into a single national transport agency.

Of course, we should remember that Mr.Varadkers predecessor, the Fine Gael “minister for Rip-off Ireland”, Phil Hogan, called for the creation of a “Consumer Rights Enforcer” – effectively the National Consumer Agency, which they’re now going to get rid of. Are we just playing politics here?


Fine Gael fail to understand the concept of Supply and Demand

This story was in the Irish Examiner last week. Fergus O’Dowd, Fine Gael TD for Louth and Tipperary native, bemoans the fact that Irish Rail charge €27 return to get from Tipperary to Dublin, but it costs €45 return to get from Dublin to Tipperary.

Obviously the cost of getting home to visit the relations at the weekends from Dublin is having an adverse impact on the deputys pocket.

Being from Mayo myself, for years the anomalies of the CIE/Irish Rail fares for the Westport to Dublin train were a mystery. Why did a single and a return cost the same money was a great example.

And more recently, it never ceases to amaze me that I can’t buy a return ticket from Dublin to Wexford on a Friday evening from the ticket machines in Connolly or Pearse stations. Nor can I buy a return from Wexford to Dublin on a Sunday evening in Wexford or Enniscorthy station ticket machines.

You’d have to say though, that the response from Irish Rail chief executive Richard Fearn does make a certain amount of sense when explaining the Tipperary price differential.

He said the Tipperary-Dublin ticket price was “a significantly discounted fare” introduced in a bid to “create a local market” in Tipperary for rail services.

The article goes on:

In response to questions from Mr O’Dowd, he said Irish Rail was committed to trying to converge fares, meaning a journey in one direction would be priced at the same level as a journey in the opposite direction.

Presumably, Deputy O’Dowd means for the prices to converge to the lower €27 fare (the discounted fare) rather than the normal price of €45. Shouldn’t the deputy really quit while he, and consumers, are ahead rather than pushing for a price convergence which is more likely to leave everyone paying €45 rather than some people paying €27?


Leo Varadkar advocates consumers giving interest free 3 year loans to retailers

I was interested to read the results of a Fine Gael survey on gift vouchers. Leo Varadkar estimates that “€40 million worth of vouchers are never redeemed, representing a huge windfall for retailers”.

Seriously though – who’s fault is that? It’s hardly retailers fault that consumers don’t use gift vouchers presented to them? Or is it the retailers fault that a consumer gets a voucher and doesn’t bother making an effort to use it in the time period stated on the voucher?

Leo – cop yourself on! If I get a voucher that says I have three months to spend the cash, it’s my fault if I try to spend it in 4 months time, not the retailers.

If the terms and conditions on the vouchers are “unfair” or have the potential of “callously ripping off consumers” then isn’t it up to the consumers who purchase the vouchers to not actually buy them in the first place?

And as for your suggestion that there be a three year time expiry on vouchers, that’s nearly just as much of a gift to retailers as not using the vouchers at all.

In your proposed NCA supported fantasy world, giving a retailer €100 for a voucher now and allowing someone 3 years to spend it is the same as a 3 year interest free loan from the consumer to said retailer. And then take into account 5% inflation per year, the retailer only then has to hand over €85 worth of goods at the end of the loan period.

Shouldn’t you instead be encouraging consumers to use their vouchers as quickly as possible? It’s hardly good “enterprise or trade” to be encouraging consumers to be providing interest free loans to retailers with discounted repayment amounts?

Now, we know you’re only bringing this up because it was on Joe Duffy last week. He was talking about Muslims in Ireland today – when can we expect your press release on this?

Don’t you have anything better to be doing – like “marking” your counterpart who’s in the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment at a time when we’re losing hundreds of jobs per week?


Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes

hit counter